September. Up north, a great month. In Arkansas, as sticky and hot as August but with brown leaves. Having been back at work for several weeks, and having given the matter much thought, I can now conclude: sabbatical life is better. Returning to teaching has not been easy—I almost never see my colleagues; I miss the chattering clumps of students as they wait outside our offices for meetings, all now diverted to the screen; and I’m struggling to meet the freshmen where they are, which, as a wise, soon-to-be graduating student said, is sixteen rather than eighteen. The pandemic took its toll on us all, but on their cohort especially. The students and I had a breakthrough at the end of the month, though; maybe better times are ahead.
In addition to all that there were Jewish holidays to celebrate/squeeze into the demands of the non-Jewish world, scholarship deadlines to navigate, and home fires to keep burning. What there was not was much time for reading. Here’s what I squeezed in.
Georges Simenon, The Grand Banks Café (1931) Trans. David Coward (2014)
Short, even for Simenon, and vicious, even for Simenon. I think this is the first one in which Madame Maigret appears. She’s pretty long-suffering, isn’t she?
Tomasz Jedrowski, Swimming in the Dark (2020)
Moving novel about a gay love affair in early 80s Poland. Ludwik meets Janusz at a summer agricultural camp for university students—they are bused from the capital to help with the sugar beet harvest. Ludwik brings with him a copy of Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room, which he glues into the pages of a less incendiary book, and the knowledge that he’s gay, which he has rarely acted upon. He’s immediately drawn to Janusz’s beauty—he comes across Janusz swimming after a hot, dusty day in the fields—but convinces himself his feelings could never be reciprocated. Still, mustering his courage and giving in to the other man’s teasing, he lends Janusz the forbidden Baldwin. Days later Janusz returns it, saying only that he liked it and could see why the authorities had banned it. Then he suggests they take a camping holiday after the season is over. The trip is an idyll, intoxicatingly depicted by Jedrowski, who has a fine feeling for the landscapes of late-Communist Poland, a place that despite its repression feels quiet and simple. But Jedroski cuts any hint of nostalgia short. Things get complicated when the lovers return to Warsaw: Ludwik struggles to have his dissertation topic approved by the requisite state functionaries, and Janusz turns evasive, unwilling to risk his career prospects in a country where the intelligence service regularly blackmailed gay men, even as he is torn between his feelings for Ludwik and his commitment to the ideology that had allowed him to escape his rural working-class background. I won’t reveal the ending; suffice it to say that the novel takes the form of an unsent letter from Ludwik’s exile in New York.
Swimming in the Dark is modest, less gorgeous at the sentence level than, say, Garth Greenwell’s What Belongs to You, but satisfying anyway. There’s nothing unusual about its style or structure—though I’m now keen to re-read Giovanni’s Room to see just how much how much Jedrowski plays with it—but its story of two young men, each blind in his own way, has a pleasing inevitability. (I learned some things, too, not least that Michel Foucault was caught in a honey-trap in 1960s Poland.) I look forward to seeing what Jedrowski, who has written what for him is a historical novel in what must be his second or third language (he was born in West Germany in 1985 to Polish parents and educated at Cambridge and the Université de Paris), will write next.
Sarah Perry, After Me Comes the Flood (2014)
A real tolle lege situation: browsing in my local indie while my daughter collected an armful of dragon books, I came across Perry’s first novel, which I did not think had been published in the US. (It was not, until recently.) I picked it up and read the opening paragraph:
I’m writing this in a stranger’s room on a broken chair and an old school desk. The chair creaks if I move, and so I must keep very still. The lid of the desk is scored with symbols that might well have been made by children or men, and at the bottom of the inkwell a beetle is lying on its back. Just now I thought I saw it move, but it’s as dry as a husk and must’ve died long before I came.
Part I Capture the Castle, part Molloy: I was hooked. I swallowed the book in a few short bursts, including the hot tired almost hallucinatory parts of Yom Kippur afternoon. A man, an antiquarian bookseller in London, is plagued by headache. It has not rained for more than a month. He must leave his cramped life, he sets out to stay with his brother on the coast of Norfolk. On the way, his car breaks down; when he ascends the steps of the first, solitary house he comes across, the door opens and he is greeted by name. He has been expected. It is all a mistake, but not one he finds himself willing to correct. So far, so satisfyingly Gothic—shades of Du Maurier’s masterly The Scapegoat. The house belongs to a solitary, ugly, motherly, sinister woman who has gathered a number of odd people around her: a former preacher who lost his faith; a pianist who practices endlessly in an adjoining room, breaking off only to berate herself; a young man convinced that only his nightly watch is keeping the adjoining reservoir from crumbling and flooding the property.
After Me Comes the Flood takes a surprising turn, though, in explaining its situation—how the household came to be, how the narrator could be mistaken for someone else—but in remaining no less puzzling and delightful. There’s an outing to the beach, a misunderstanding that leads to a crisis, and a final literal and metaphorical storm. And plenty of good writing—look again at that opening, with its fear and longing for movement, to the point of near-hallucination. And that strange line about symbols that might have been “made by children or men,” the addition of “children” making it unlikely that “men” means “human.” Do symbols made by women look different? Or are these scratchings of more unearthly origin?
Don’t sleep on this strange little book about interpretation.
Kristen Radtke, Seek You: A Journey Through American Loneliness (2021)
Radtke’s comic, drawn in shadowy, pained colours—even the reds and browns look green—is a hybrid essay/memoir about loneliness. A CQ call is what ham radio operators make when they are looking to see if anyone is listening. Radtke learns that her father, a forbidding, silent man she could never talk to, was obsessed with ham radio as a boy. Fitting, then, that his daughter would later experiment with the new technology of internet chat forums. Radtke describes a life spent looking for connection and fearing rejection, but her book is mostly not about her. The memoir elements are deftly handled—I especially liked a closing riff on the letters listeners would send to Casey Kasem’s Top 40 Countdown radio show in the 80s and 90s, in which they bared their souls about abandoned lovers, damaged friendships, family arguments, all of which they hoped to overcome by dedicating a song into the void—but they play second fiddle to her descriptions of a century’s worth of psychological and neurological research into loneliness. Radtke references the philosopher Hannah Arendt, the sociologist Robert Putnam (whose book Bowling Alone considers the drift away from civic engagement in late 20th early 21st century America), and the artist Yayoi Kusama, whose installations of mirrored balls respond to but perhaps also further human separation. She considers spinsters, cowboys, and so-called “lone gunmen.” She writes about how grief is processed on social media and how some nursing homes use robotic companions for lonely patients. But most fascinatingly she tells the story of Harry Harlow, a psychologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, near where Radtke grew up, whose research on rhesus monkeys challenged the early 20th century ideology that parents should be distant from their children lest they make them soft, weak, too easily attached.
But these humane conclusions stemmed from experiments that tortured his nonhuman animal subjects. Harlow separated infants from their mothers and reared them in isolation, offering them dummy substitute caregiver figures (the monkeys would cling to one made of cloth even though another one, which dispensed milk but was made of prickly wire, was their source of food). Later introduced into groups of ordinarily socialized monkeys, the formerly isolated subjects were shunned—the damage done to them was apparent—and abhorrent—to their fellows. In his most horrifying experiment, Harlow wanted to find out what would happen when the monkeys who had been so traumatically separated became parents. He strapped the females into a contraption he called a “rape rack” and let male monkeys loose on them. The mothers ignored their offspring, sometimes even attacking and killing them. Harlow—a depressive alcoholic who crushed the spirit of two brilliant wives—concluded that love is nothing but proximity. Touch and contact are central to primate flourishing. Perversely, the man who gave us these insights was unable to demonstrate closeness or kindness. Harlow’s life makes harrowing reading, but I won’t soon forget him—or Radtke’s telling in this smart and engaging work.
Walter Mosley, Charcoal Joe (2016)
My first Easy Rawlins PI novel—though I remember loving the movie version of Devil in a Blue Dress back in the day—and I see I’ve picked up the series deep into its baroque period. (The audio book was ready to hand at the library.) I struggled to get a handle on all the characters established earlier in the series, but the mystery occupied me and the character of Rawlins appealed. The book’s sexual politics are not great, though: both sentimental and a little prurient. And yet I enjoyed it enough—compelled by its portrait of the black counterculture of 1960s LA—to go back to the series’ beginning.
Cal Flyn, Islands of Abandonment: Nature Rebounding in the Post-Human Landscape (2021)
A forbidden area near Verdun where poisoned gas has been dumped into the soil. An abandoned research garden in Tanzania where the botanical specimens have invaded the surrounding forest. The green line running across the island of Cyprus. These are just some of the places Cal Flyn visits in her book about how nature reclaims and reinvents landscapes abandoned by people. There’s the zone of exclusion at Chernobyl, too, that’s almost a must for anyone thinking about this topic. But Fyn considers lesser-known places too, like the Scottish bings, mountains of stone chips—blaes, technically—formed from oil shale extraction perpetrated in the late 19th century. Or the abandoned fields of Estonia, where, since the collapse of the USSR, forests have sprung up, erasing the scars of collectivized agriculture. Or the Caribbean island of Montserrat, covered over by lava flows and ash in the mid 1990s. These are ruined but also vital places: despite having been harmed they contain much more biodiversity than the spaces humans inhabit. Flyn writes:
And yet everywhere I have looked, everywhere I have been—places bent and broken, despoiled and desolate, polluted and poisoned—I have found new life springing from the wreckage of the old, life all the stranger and more valuable for its resilience.
It seems that all the world needs is for people to get out of the way. Nature will do its thing, life will find a way. In this sense the book—written in accessible but not simple prose, Flyn writes a better sentence than most contemporary non-fiction writers—is a hymn to the possibilities of a world without us. But it rejects the consoling fantasy of human annihilation, rejecting terms like “pristine” or “untouched”—these are fantasy states, neither possible nor desirable. Flyn worries that her book is too sanguine, too suggestive of a future that will be good again despite our efforts to destroy the planet. She knows time is short if biological life as it currently exits is to persist. I can’t forget her description of the Salton Basin—a former lake created in the middle of California after the damning and diverting of the Colorado river, but which has evaporated leaving a desert of dust and toxic residue, now how to a population of loners, escapees, dropouts—as a denuded, yet not meaningless future. Flyn thinks of her book as a suggestion that all is not yet lost, and that if we can leave things alone, rather than always trying to intervene, the “natural world” will do what it does, namely, to persist, to adapt, to live.
I’d be curious what readers more familiar with what gets called nature writing today think, but I appreciated how Flyn consoled without flattering human self-satisfaction.
Denis Johnson, Train Dreams (2011)
As I wrote to reader, podcaster, and all-around good guy Paul Wilson, I had such a hard time leaving off the hilarious set-piece in which a man tells the story of how he was shot by his dog that I sat in the parking lot at school, in thrall to actor Will Patton’s delivery of Denis Johnson’s much-loved novella, until I was almost late for my first meeting. Which might make the book seem quirky, even feel-good—the misapprehension that this was some Coen Brothers-type mashup of violence and sentimentality had kept me from reading it sooner—but it is much stranger and lovelier than that. Robert Granier is a railroad labourer and logger in Idaho and Washington in the early part of the 20th century. His is a life of solitude, with the all-too brief exception of his marriage and fatherhood. It is an unexceptional but terribly dramatic life, which, despite extending into the era of television and Elvis Presley, is, as is true for most people, governed mostly by the mores and concerns of the horse-drawn years of his childhood and youth. Johnson structures his book around vivid scenes—a terrible forest fire, an encounter with wolves, a late explosion of almost overwhelming sexual desire—but the most vivid, the most terrible of them is the opening, in which Granier, for reasons he can never fathom, though racism and the instinct to join in with the actions of a group that the rest of his life is a reaction against are among them, helps some white workers throw a Chinese labourer accused of stealing from the company store of the Spokane International Railway off a railway bridge. The man gets away, but the specter of the violence and hatred unleashed in the scene colours the whole narrative. I feel like everyone loves this book—for once everyone is right.
Not a lot of books this month, but not a lot of duds, either. The Simenon and the Mosley were the weakest; the Perry and the Johnson the strongest. How about you? What were you up to last month?
Surprised you managed to get any reading done at all, Dorian, considering everything else going on. And you wrote it all up before mid-October too!
Past self did present self a bit of a favour, but writing some stuff down as I went along… And I happen to have no grading to do this weekend, amazingly enough…
When I don’t read, I get so grumpy. October has not been good in this regard…
A very good month of reading Dorian despite how challenging it was to get back to work, I do hope things get easier.
The Sarah Perry really appeals, if it has shades of The Scapegoat then I know I’m going to like it. Train Dreams is also on my TBR, I read his Jesus’ Son many years ago and recall being mesmerized.
I just finished the second book in the Cazalet series and thought I’ll read a couple of novellas before starting on the third.
Do check out the Perry if you get a chance, Radz. And Train Dreams, definitely read that. I enjoyed the movie of Jesus’ Son many years ago; I think I might try the book.
I stalled out in the second Cazalet — I started it on a trip and I always have a hard time finishing books when I get back home. It’s weird. Does that ever happen to you?
Yesss! It happened to me this year with ‘If You Kept a Record of Sins’ by Bajani. I had finished half the book but did not carry it with me on a short 3 day trip. By then I had moved on to other books and only picked it up again after two months!
Also excited to discover that I already own the Perry! I seem to have bought it many years ago and then forgot about it as always 😀
A gift from your past self!
The travel thing happens to me all the time (or, it used to, back when I went places…) Unless I’m close to finishing a book when I get back from a trip, I have a hard time sticking with it, even if I like the book.
I finally read Train Dreams only a few years ago. It made a deep impression on me as well. Johnson holding that mirror to the racism of the times happening so near the beginning is all the stronger for the dispassionate rendering. Johnson is not about to spend that brief novel moralizing, and to put that incident up front is bold and clear as a cold lake the temperature of which you’re forced to feel. I loved that novel best in that particular year of reading.
The Journey/Loneliness book sounds harrowing, but how good to report back on it. I haven’t read those crime novels, but I’m looking forward to to reading Mrs. Mohr is Missing, penned by a charming gay male couple, and which I learned about through our mutual acquaintance Marina Sofia!
And of course Giovanni’s Room…
Best of luck to you with the students!
Thanks, Jenny. The other scene that stays with me from Train Dreams is the one in which Granier comes across a dying man (I think a tree crushed his leg, I forget). He just wants a drink of water but Granier is too freaked out and abandons him.
I read Mrs. Mohr is missing last year (it’s in one of my monthly updates, probably from the spring). I liked it ok, butI wasn’t overwhelmed. I am a bit curious, though, if the series improves–number 2 is now out in the US…
Now you’re just making me want to read Train Dreams again! Happily I still have my copy.
Is it Karolina, Or the Torn Curtain, follow on from Mrs. Mohr? They were fortunate to have Antonia Lloyd-Jones as the translator, I think she’s wonderful.
I’m looking forward to reading Esther Freud, and grateful for the tips you gave me on that! Be well.
That’s the one–and agree re: Antonia Lloyd-Jones.
Please report back on how Esther Freud treats you!
An interesting variety as always! Madame Maigret is a great addition to the series and the character does develop. I’ve just been reading one of Simenon’s stand- alone novels, The Little Man form Archangel. I love his use of time. You’ve reminded me I need to read more Denis Johnson, and that Walter Mosley wrote science fiction!
I recently learned about that one–had never heard of it before. Glad you recommend it.
I’m curious to try more Johnson, but I;m not sure where to go next. I did not know that about Walter Mosley!
Train Dreams left me gasping–it was so good. I don’t have the right words for what I felt.
An impressive accomplishment all right.
I teach Devil in a Blue Dress often in my mystery survey. I didn’t like it the first time I read it but I have grown to think it is really very smart about linking its plot to issues of racial justice in ways that aren’t simple-minded. It is a bit florid, though, and I don’t think all of its sexual politics angles work — though in this respect it is true to its noir influences. I have not read further in the series, though, for no particular reason except, I guess, that initial period of dislike for this one.
I’m glad you weighed in, Rohan, thank you, because I know you teach Devil and wondered if you’d read more.
I just finished listening to the audio of Devil–I enjoyed its race/class/politics more than the investigation, though you are right that in its sexual politics it is true to its influences (nicely put!).
I actually prefer the end of the movie, which, in my memory has Denzel Washington affirming with pride that he is returning to *his* home in *his* neighbourhood. I appreciated how much owning property is important to the novel.
Anyway, I might read more of the series, not sure yet.
Thanks for the Sarah Perry reminder; my library didn’t have After Me… back in the spring when I read her other books, but now they do!
Did you like the others?
Loved Melmoth. The Essex Serpent was engrossing at a moment when I really needed a fat Victorian-era novel, but IMO Melmoth is better.
I’m glad to hear this, because Melmoth interests me more. I will check it out.
Great diversity here! I’m going to take time to look more closely at a whole bunch of titles you featured. Glad I found your blog through Simon (Stuck in a Book)
Thank you for reading. Plenty more titles under review on the blog–I’d love to know if you come across any favourites.
Since you read some Holocaust-related books, I thought you might be interested in my pick for the 1976 club:
Since you read some Holocaust-related books, I thought you might be interested in my pick for the 1976 club:
It Concerns You Too by Herman Sachnowitz
1976 Club is where people review books from a particular year, this time it was 1976:
Beautifully written. I’ll have to check out Swimming in the Dark. Thanks!
Thanks for reading! Let me know what you make of the book.