The month began in full mid-semester throttle. I taught a colleague’s class at a university at the other end of the State—preparing for that was a lot of work. Then I organized a visit to campus from a friend who presented on his work in progress. And almost the minute I dropped him at the airport, things started being canceled: our daughter’s school; then mine; then we were hunkering down for the foreseeable. And the month kept on going, stretching out endlessly, a disorienting expanse of fear and stress and, strangely, intimacy and, oh I don’t know, not languor or relaxation, but time. (To be able to experience is a sign of our privilege.) During all of it, I was reading, I hear a lot about people being unable to read at the moment. I get that, but since reading, for me, is a way to keep the world at bay I’ve been struggling with the opposite problem. I need reading even more than usual, but life (switching to remote teaching, figuring out how to handle our daughter’s homeschooling) is making that harder. Still, my family and I are safe, we’re mostly enjoying our time together, our dogs think this is the best thing that’s ever happened.
Louise Erdrich, The Round House (2012)
The narrator of Erdrich’s novel, thirteen-year-old Joe Coutts, lives on a rez in North Dakota in the late 80s. At the beginning of the summer during which the book is set, Joe’s mother is violently attacked and raped, plunging the family into a tailspin from which it recovers only at great cost. Frustrated at the lack of progress in finding and arresting the perpetrator—a frustration that has much to do with the disparity between Federal and Tribal law, and the insufficiencies of the latter as enshrined by the callousness of the former: a frustration felt even more strongly by Joe’s father, a judge on the rez—Joe and his best friends try to solve the crime. That could sound cute, but although often funny and filled with a large and sometimes larger than life cast of characters, the novel is sorrowful, especially when two more instances of unexpected violence bring matters to a chastened conclusion. I was surprised at Erdrich’s decision to narrate this story of violence against indigenous women from the point of view of a teenage boy, but one of her points, I think, is that such violence is everyone’s problem. I listened to the audiobook—the last of this semester’s commuting, as it turned out—and another pleasure was the actor Gary Farmer’s reading: I loved his cadence and emphases. My first Erdrich, but not my last.
Paulette Jiles, Enemy Women (2002)
You may remember me rhapsodizing over Jiles’s News of the World. I didn’t quite like this earlier novel as much, but I still liked it a lot. I’m so ignorant about the Civil War (I’m Canadian, sue me), but I bet even many American readers might not know that women from Confederate families (or even families who supported neither side) were jailed for (supposedly) abetting the enemy. Enemy Women is set in Missouri, especially the hills between Rolla and the Bootheel, land I’ve driven through plenty of times on my way from Little Rock to St. Louis, which I’ll now never think of in the same way. (Usually I try not to think of it, finding it incredibly dull. It certainly wasn’t in the 1860s.) Missouri wasn’t just swept across by the Union and Confederate Armies; it was also ravaged by militia on both sides. The women of Jiles’s title were mostly arrested by the Missouri Union Militia. As The New York Times reviewer resonantly put it, “the Ozarks became a wilderness of free-floating entrepreneurs of violence.” 18-year-old Adair Colley is arrested and sent to a jail in St. Louis after her family’s farm is burned, her father taken away, and her siblings scattered. In prison Adair draws the attention of her interrogator, Major William Neumann. The two begin a romance but are soon separated: Neumann is reassigned to Alabama while Adair escapes and tries to return to what’s left of her farm. Jiles switches between the storylines: Neumann is interesting, but Adair is the star. I found the first part of the novel slow, but I read the last third in a long rush that left me tired (but unrepentant!) the next morning. (There’s a bit in which she shakes off a dangerous pursuer that’s real heart-in-the-throat stuff.) This was Jiles’s first novel (she had published several books of poetry before that) and she’s certainly improved a lot since then. Even so Enemy Women is definitely worth your time.
Rennie Airth, The Decent Inn of Death (2020)
Latest installment of a crime series that (a) does not have too many books in it and (b) is worth reading even though later books don’t reach the heights of the first ones. Interestingly, Airth has let the characters age: their inabilities are central to this case, which riffs on the classic country-house murder.
Friedrich Gorenstein, Redemption (1967) Trans. Andrew Bromfield (2018)
The last text I taught in person before we switched to remote learning. A few months ago, I worried students might find this novel of postwar Russia difficult and off-putting. Proving once again that even twenty years into the gig I know nothing about teaching, they loved it. Many said it was their favourite text so far. (And we’d read Ruth Kluger and Art Spiegelman!) Students were rightly fascinated by Gorenstein’s ambivalent portrayal of his teenage protagonist, Sashenka, who veers between cruelty and kindness and isn’t sure what she wants, just that she feels everything a lot. (The word the book most often uses about her is “spite.”) Gorenstein veers between realism and religious/philosophical abstraction; to me, he’s more compelling when writing in the former mode. What’s hard to figure out is how Gorenstein would have us reconcile psychology with sociology. His presentation of the Holocaust is strikingly non-ideological. On the one hand, he acknowledges the murder of Jews (rare in Soviet literature); on the other, he presents those murders as personal and local rather than systematic and genocidal. He’s good, though, on the terrible intimacy and physicality of such killing.
Attica Locke, Bluebird, Bluebird (2017)
Set on and around Highway 59 in east Texas—the very route we were planning to take on a canceled Spring Break trip to Houston—the first in a new series for Locke is atmospheric and interesting. (She’s writing about Texas, but it could easily be Arkansas. Normally I’m allergic to all things Southern/Arkansan, even though I’ve landed here; that Locke kept me engaged with this material says something.) Darren Mathews, her hero, is a black Texas Ranger who grew up in east Texas, left as soon as he could, but was drawn home again. He’s got a complicated family background that Locke uses to good effect and a predictably failing marriage that is less interesting. The book is best on race relations in the South (less straightforward than many non-Southerners like to imagine). It is weakest in hewing to conventions of the procedural (renegade cop, troubles with alcohol). According to her bio, Locke has been writing for TV a lot. More power to her—it’s where the money is—but the book manifests a certain sheen or glibness, an unwillingness to let scenes linger, that smacks of the more disappointing qualities of television pacing. I found Steph Cha’s recent take on how to write crime fiction that challenges the institutional racism of policing more compelling.
Attica Locke, Heaven, My Home (2019)
Sequel to Bluebird (they could be read as a single novel). Competent, but I’m not convinced Locke has yet figured out what she wants to do with the series. Most interesting when it addresses how quickly life changed for minorities—including those in the police—after Trump got elected.
Ruth Prawer Jhabvala, Heat and Dust (1975)
Cool, even icy, novel about a woman who travels to India to learn about her grandfather’s first wife, who left him for an Indian prince in the 1920s. I didn’t care for it, but Tom’s review made me appreciate it more. He really helped me think about the novel’s narration. The 1970s material takes the form of the narrator’s diary; the 1920s material is in third person. Where’s it coming from? Is the narrator writing it? If so, why/how does it include material the narrator surely couldn’t have known? Or is it omniscient? If so, what’s the relationship between the two timelines? What information should we trust? Is the narrator any different than the hippies surging through India on the hunt for spiritual enlightenment? Is she any different than her not-quite grandmother? What does it mean that her life begins to imitate her ancestor’s? These are interesting questions, but they’re more interesting than the novel itself. You certainly can’t accuse it of romanticizing India. If anything, it dislikes the place. In that sense, it’s still a colonial text—India observed from the outside. And I found the willingness of both female characters to have sex with men despite having no real interest in doing so troubling. (Quite a strange aspect of the novel: sex isn’t about liberation or pleasure or, conversely, violence or trauma. It’s a blank.) In the end, Heat and Dust gave off more dust than heat—I like my fiction warmer. But those with different tastes might feel differently. Not sure I’d try any of Prawer Jhabvala’s other novels. Are they all like this?
Kathleen Jamie, Surfacing (2019)
I loved this essay collection, which Stephen Sparks of Point Reyes Books, who sold it to me, said is not even her best. (Naturally, I ordered her first two from him immediately.) I read most of it outside on the back porch in those days after face-to-face teaching stopped and before remote learning started—a dead, anxious, weird time that happened to coincide with that short time in Arkansas when the weather is gorgeous, the humidity low, and the mosquitoes not yet swarming. With less traffic on the roads (but not that much less: shamefully, Arkansas still does not have a Stay at Home order), the birds were louder and more frolicsome than usual. The azaleas in full bloom, the irises coming out, the redbuds just moving from that gorgeous pink blossom to their ordinary ugly leaves. I mention all this because Jamie is so attuned to place; reading her essays helped me be more so too. What made this an especially good book to read now is that many of its essays are about sojourns Jamie made to remote, isolated places that are nonetheless characterized by strong senses of community. We see that in a remembrance of travelling to the Chinese border with Tibet during the time of Tiananmen, a three-part piece on the excavation of a Neolithic settlement in the Orkneys, and, especially, in a long, magnificent essay about a summer spent in a Yup’ik village on the Alaskan coast, where the thawing tundra is bringing forth revelations about the area’s ancient hunter gatherer culture. (I am a sucker for all things northern, dream of traveling north of 60, so this essay was Extremely My Shit, but I also think it’s just objectively gorgeous and moving.) In all cases, Jamie shows that for things to surface, change has to happen, and that change isn’t always good. In the case of climate change, it’s terrifying. But these are hopeful, not hopeless essays. Not naïve, but sustaining. And boy that is what I need right now.
Sarah Kofman, Rue Ordener, Rue Labat (1994) Trans. Ann Smock (1996)
A book I’ve read many times. Even though I stand by most of the things I say here, my sense of the memoir has evolved over the years. And it changed yet again this month: students always like it, but this was the best experience I’d had with it, all the more astonishing because we studied it together remotely. This group helped me see how obviously Rue Ordener is a traumatized text, so different, for example, from self-reflective Holocaust texts like Kluger’s Still Alive or Spiegelman’s Maus. Kofman forgoes retrospection, making it hard to decide how she feels about her experiences, especially what it was like to be torn between her mother and the casually antisemitic Frenchwoman who hid her in occupied Paris. Yet as a student pointed out the very raw, unprocessed, or traumatized quality of the text might itself be an illusion, a stealth way of exerting control by challenging us not to interpret. Highly recommended.
Surfacing was my book of the month, followed by Enemy Women and The Round House. Rue Ordener I know so well I can’t even rank it here. Maybe I’ll read a little more in April. Or maybe not. At any rate, I’ve finished a very long cowboy novel that’s been keeping me entertained. Let me know what you’ve been reading during the pandemic, if you’ve been reading at all. And most importantly stay well, friends.
Isn’t Kathleen Jamie wonderful? So glad you discovered her soothing power of thoughtful, quiet curiosity and observation. I liked Attica Locke’s earlier novels even more, before she started writing for television (same with George Pelecanos). TV makes them gain in smoothness or action, but lose some of the depth and ambiguity.
Yes, I really liked Surfacing a lot. In fact, her first two just arrived in the post today! Glad you like her too.
I read Locke’s first book when it came out. (Ok, I think? I have no memory.) I’m quite a fan of Pelecanos, but I agree that I don’t think writing for TV has helped his fiction.
That’s the second mention of Jamie I’ve read in as many days – I really must read her!
Take it as a sign, Karen. She’s very good!
How I wish it were warm enough to read outside here! That would make this all feel much less grim. Well, as it drags on (if it drags on?) into summer, our porch days will come. This is a really interesting range of reading. Louise Erdrich is someone who has been on my radar a long time but I have yet to read any of her novels, so this is a good nudge. I have tried a couple of Attica Locke’s books and never made it more than a few chapters in: I’m not sure why. As you know, I don’t actually read that widely in detective fiction these days anyway and I think it’s because too often I feel the mechanism of it grinding away. It takes a really good writer (like Tana French) to lure me deep enough in that I stop minding about that.
I’m excited that Erdrich has so many other books. I asked about her a while ago on Twitter and people seemed pretty into her work generally, so I think you could start anywhere.
People in the crime lit biz seem to like Locke a lot. Maybe she is an awesome person. The three I’ve read have been fine, but I see nothing to get excited about.
Maybe it takes a writer who is really doing something at the level of style to obscure the mechanism you mention.
It is not true that I assume every novel is Pale Fire until it proves otherwise. But it is close to true. Writers, be sophisticated about your narrators! For Pete’s sake, ya bums.
I still wonder if I should do one of these monthly roundups, since I enjoy yours so much, but I always have two or three, or this March five or six, books about which I have nothing to say, so I wonder how that would go. I guess I could just say that.
I just didn’t think Heat & Dust was sure enough of what it was trying to do. But I’m so grateful to your piece: it made me reassess my thinking, and value the book more. A wonderful thing about blogs.
I’d love to know what those books are you have nothing to say about. And I bet a lot of other people would too. Twenty years of having to find something to say about a text before going into the classroom, even when I have no clue or no desire, has made me able always to say *something,* even if it’s uninteresting. Déformation professionnelle, as the French so aptly say.
Yes, when I was on a five-a-week schedule, I would have had something to say about the early-1930s poems of Conrad Aiken (actual March example) even if it moidered me. It is a luxury to have nothing to say.
I remember a professor in college you had just retired saying he loved not having to say anything every day. I can totally get that. It was heroic the way you posted every day *for years*.
Lots of these are new to me – both the writers and the books. But the one that really appeals is Surfacing. I actually have it here at home, purely because a copy arrived damaged at the shop before the lockdown shutters came down, so it’s been sitting on my night table even since. (Lucky me.) The sense of community and connectedness (if that’s a word?) really resonate with me, especially in the current age of isolation. I’ll try to make a start on it soon – it could be a good one to dip in and out of every now and again in between other reads.
PS I love the idea that your dogs think the lockdown is the best thing that’s ever happened to them! Pets all over the world must be loving all the attention they’re getting right now. Endless company and treats – what could possibly be better than that?
Surfacing is excellent for dipping into, Jacqui. That said, I found it so compelling I read it over just a couple of days. I’m curious what you’ll make of it.
Yes, at least the pets (dogs anyway, maybe cats are annoyed) are getting something out of this whole business!
Pingback: “A wing’s beat and it’s gone”: Kathleen Jamie’s Sightlines | Eiger, Mönch & Jungfrau
Pingback: My Year in Reading, 2020 | Eiger, Mönch & Jungfrau