Ugh, April. A terrible month in my line of work at the best of times. Which this April, of course, was not. I was both busy—the last four weeks of the semester are always crunch time—but also, strangely, not. (No commute, far fewer admin obligations, the many office hour meetings vanished to almost nothing.) The month felt like a Zoom class that leaves exhausted but also unsatisfied. (God, I hate looking at myself so much.) Some days the pandemic routine was just fine, even enjoyable. Other days terror and depression pinched hard. On the plus side, we spent so much time together as a family. But on the downside, we spent so much time together as a family.
April is the best month of the year, weather wise, in Little Rock. And in that regard at least 2020 didn’t disappoint, so we were outside in the yard a lot. I fear what will happen when the hot weather sets in, in a couple of weeks or so. So I tried to read outside as much as I could. But what I mostly read this month was undergraduate prose—many, many essay drafts and short writing exercises. Some of that writing was excellent, some not. Either way, it took me away from books, plus I was working away at some chunksters. Thus this meager final tally:
Philip Kerr, Greeks Bearing Gifts (2018)
Ingenious of Kerr to make his rumpled anti-hero Bernie Gunther an insurance adjuster in this last book of the series. (Kerr completed one more before he died, but it is set back in the 1920s, with Bernie a rookie beat cop.) Insurance is a great milieu for non-PI crime investigating, and I’m surprised more writers don’t take advantage of it. (Double Indemnity, of course, and Don Winslow’s California Fire and Life—can you think of others?) Here, Bernie is sent to Greece to investigate a suspicious claim. No surprise, what he finds relates to the Nazi occupation of the 1940s. What is a surprise is the ending, which offers a new, but quite fitting, direction for Bernie, serving an intriguing new set of masters. I would have loved to see Kerr develop these possibilities, but it’s satisfying as it is.
Larry McMurtry, Lonesome Dove (1985)
A damn good book, which kept me company through the first confusing and anxious pandemic weeks, back when things felt both more terrifying and less depressing than now. In the 1870s, down by the Mexican border, a group of cowboys work the Hat Creek ranch under the direction of two former Texas Rangers. The return of an old comrade and a sense that life has become played out convince the men to drive a herd of cattle north to Montana, where they plan to set up the first ranch in the territory.
Lonesome Dove has an exciting plot (McMurtry is good with weather, and he sure knows how to create drama out of a river crossing), but what it really has is a set of great characters. (Be warned: the intersection of these qualities often takes the form of death. You’ll lose several people you’ve become quite attached to.) For me, the book is about the things other people can see about you that you yourself just can’t. (A theme abetted by the novel’s roving omniscience.) Lonesome Dove is about the limits of self-knowledge—limits that abet the uncaringness of the universe that everyone, we learn, runs aground against anyway. Most heartbreaking is the inability of the outfit’s stoic leader, Captain Woodrow Call, to acknowledge that he’s the father of one of its youngest members. (There’s a beautiful, moving, frustrating scene between them at the end: the book’s plenty sentimental, which I like.) Almost as heartbreaking is the story of Call’s partner, Captain Augustus McCrae, as excitable and gregarious as Call is reticent, who is felled not by reencountering the love of his life but by his own stubbornness and vanity.
The novel’s only weakness is that there are almost no women in, only three really, though to be fair they’re important, and McMurtry handles two of them well (especially McCrae’s old flame, Emily). The prostitute Lorena Wood is less successful: what might have seemed a sensitive portrait in the 1980s doesn’t work today. But the book has a sweep, a verve, a love of life (it’s often laugh-out-loud funny) that really captivated me, and I can imagine tit ending up on my end of the year list.
Georges Didi-Huberman, Bark (2011) Trans. Samuel Martin (2017)
I can’t be fussed to look back and see what I wrote when I first read this a couple of years ago. Pretty sure I liked it then; I like it a lot now. I’ve taught it twice, and it’s a keeper. Didi-Huberman—a French academic who has written a lot about photography—juxtaposes photographs he took on a visit to Auschwitz-Birkenau with little essayistic reflections on the experience. I now have a better handle on his argument, viz, we need to see without looking, which is to say, without being guided by preconceptions. Only self-awareness about the limitations of looking can let us do that. Students love the book—that came through even over our less-than-ideal video sessions. On my previous readings, I hadn’t picked up how much Didi-Huberman hates Claude Lanzmann, so that was a nice little bonus for me.
Henri Bosco, Malicroix (1948) Trans. Joyce Zonana (2020)
Strange and compelling, especially in its first half. A young man inherits a small house on a small island in the middle of the Rhone river—or he will if he satisfies the unusual requirements of the bequest. I will have more to say soon!
Sujata Massey, The Widows of Malabar Hill (2018)
First in a crime series set in 1920s Bombay (with detour to Calcutta). Parveen Mistry is the city’s first female solicitor (unlike her father, with whom she practices, she cannot argue in court) and a member of the city’s small but influential Parsi community. (She is modelled on the real-life Cornelia Sorabji.) When the firm is asked to execute the will of a longstanding Muslim client, Parveen’s gender turns into an asset, as the deceased three wives live in purdah. Her ability to speak to the widows directly becomes more pressing when a member of the household is found murdered. As I said about Greeks Bearing Gifts, I enjoy seeing how writers tackle the problems and opportunities offered by non-police or PI characters. It will be interesting to watch Massey deal with this constraint as the series goes forward. The crime takes a backseat to Parveen’s involved history—in this, as well as the period setting and the sensibilities of the main character, Widows reminded me of the first Maisie Dobbs novel; fans of that series will enjoy this one—but the story of her education and the unhappy events that led her to work with her father are compelling enough that I didn’t mind. I’ve already bought the second book, which, I gather, riffs on The Moonstone.
May is shaping up to be a better reading month, once again with plenty of crime but other things too. Among other things I’ve been plugging away at Vikram Seth’s A Suitable Boy. I’ve read 650 pp, and there are still 800 to go! Sometimes I just laugh at how big it is. Soothing, though. Tune in next time to see if I finish it.
“I will have more to say soon!” – Thank goodness!
Congratulations on the end of the craziest semester.
Thank you–I’m faceplanting into sabbatical, let me tell you. (Pls congratulate Maria, too.)
Not only will I have more to say, but, even better, Nat has written something. Will get that up next week.
Thank goodness is right! Tom and I were batting around a few ideas earlier, but I think we welcome more.
Finally have the time to read everyone’s posts properly!
What’s your word on Lanzmann?
Shoah is an extraordinary accomplishment, no question. But his self-proclaimed status as metaphysician of the Holocaust is annoying, he’s a bully (at least his persona in the film is), and he edits women out of the Holocaust (marginally rectified in a last film, which I have yet to see but look forward to).
I mean, his film is amazing, but not quite as holy as he thinks it is.
(BTW I just discovered your blog and read around–so good! Will you be writing more soon, pretty please?) Its frock-like tidiness is very dainty!
Love the paintings. And you make Malicroix sound so interesting from that tid-bit – I look forward to hearing more.
Thanks, Simon! Grades are submitted; will get my Malicroix shit together next week.
Congratulations on the end of a tough semester! I read a lot less too in April. I just find it harder to concentrate. Here’s hoping that May is a better month for all of us. Enjoy your summer and your sabbatical!
Pingback: Stuck in a Book’s Weekend Miscellany – Stuck in a Book
It’s been a mad time, hasn’t it? Look forward to your thoughts on Malicroix!
Well done on making it through the end of the semester. This is a great time to have a sabbatical, that’s for sure. My husband is just finishing up a half-year one, which has made this winter easier but will make the transition to whatever happens at his college in the fall harder, I think.
There’s some interesting reading here for sure. I am especially interested that you enjoyed Lonesome Dove. As you know, I’ve dabbled a small bit in Westerns in order to include them in my pulp fiction class, but I just wasn’t engaged enough by the genre to read around much once. LD is one that I kept considering, but since it looked clearly too long to assign in first year, I avoided it. I loved A Suitable Boy. I think it’s a bit like Trollope in that (as when you work through all of, say, the Palliser series) you’ve just spent so much time with everyone by the end that even if not every moment was mesmerizing, it is like a whole lifetime of relationships.
I would be *very* curious to know your take on LD, Rohan.
Although I hardly know Trollope at all, I can see what you mean: it’s the accumulation of the thing that really matters. And yes that sense of nestling in with characters for the long haul.
Have you ever read Owen Waiter’s The Virginian? I believe it’s the first Western ever written, from 1902 or something, and I love it with all my heart. Even more than Lonesome Dove.
I’ve not, but I’m curious, especially now!
Owen Wister, stupid auto-correct and the woman who didn’t proofread…
See, I didn’t even notice!
And, Suitable Boy…wonderful! I miss talking to all the children in my class from India, who taught me enough to appreciate this book.
Yes, I’m enjoying it a lot!
Lonesome Dove is just shy of a 1,000 pages. I’ve often been tempted by it, but that’s very long. I’m surprised you read as much as you did with that in the queue.
Still, I do note how much you liked it. One perhaps for a long flight sometime.
It *is* long. But 1000 pp of Lonesome Dove is not, say, 1000 pp of War and Peace. Easy reading.
LD would be great for a long flight–assuming we ever go on one of those again…
Pingback: What I Read, August 2020 | Eiger, Mönch & Jungfrau
Pingback: My Year in Reading, 2020 | Eiger, Mönch & Jungfrau